Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
