Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.