Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT affirmed the First Appellate Authority: the assessee's claim of exemption under sections 10(34) and 10(35) was held admissible; the cancellation of registration under section 12A for FY 2014-15 precluded claim under section 11, rendering the dividend and unit income exempt under 10(34)/10(35). Alleged contravention of sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2)(h) was rejected because the impugned investment constituted accretion of bonus shares and did not attract section 13(1)(d). Claims for deduction under section 80G/80GGA were remitted to the AO for verification and allowance to entities registered under section 80G(3)(a)(iiif) in accordance with section 80G(4).
The ITAT affirmed the First Appellate Authority: the assessee's claim of exemption under sections 10(34) and 10(35) was held admissible; the cancellation of registration under section 12A for FY 2014-15 precluded claim under section 11, rendering the dividend and unit income exempt under 10(34)/10(35). Alleged contravention of sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2)(h) was rejected because the impugned investment constituted accretion of bonus shares and did not attract section 13(1)(d). Claims for deduction under section 80G/80GGA were remitted to the AO for verification and allowance to entities registered under section 80G(3)(a)(iiif) in accordance with section 80G(4).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
