<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exemptions under sections 10(34)/10(35) upheld; section 12A cancellation bars section 11 claims; sections 13(1)(d)/13(2)(h) rejected; 80G remitted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93546</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the First Appellate Authority: the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under sections 10(34) and 10(35) was held admissible; the cancellation of registration under section 12A for FY 2014-15 precluded claim under section 11, rendering the dividend and unit income exempt under 10(34)/10(35). Alleged contravention of sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2)(h) was rejected because the impugned investment constituted accretion of bonus shares and did not attract section 13(1)(d). Claims for deduction under section 80G/80GGA were remitted to the AO for verification and allowance to entities registered under section 80G(3)(a)(iiif) in accordance with section 80G(4).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exemptions under sections 10(34)/10(35) upheld; section 12A cancellation bars section 11 claims; sections 13(1)(d)/13(2)(h) rejected; 80G remitted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93546</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the First Appellate Authority: the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under sections 10(34) and 10(35) was held admissible; the cancellation of registration under section 12A for FY 2014-15 precluded claim under section 11, rendering the dividend and unit income exempt under 10(34)/10(35). Alleged contravention of sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2)(h) was rejected because the impugned investment constituted accretion of bonus shares and did not attract section 13(1)(d). Claims for deduction under section 80G/80GGA were remitted to the AO for verification and allowance to entities registered under section 80G(3)(a)(iiif) in accordance with section 80G(4).</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>