Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9981 to 10000 of 96504 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held the revocation/penalty proceeding against the petitioner time-barred and quashed, directing that Regulation 17(1) CBLR, 2018 requires initiation within 90 days from receipt of an official offence report; the 2018 Regulations expressly define "offence report," which must emanate from an official source and need not follow any particular format. The respondent/licensing authority bore the burden to prove when its office received the offence report or prohibitory order but failed to do so and did not identify the triggering offence report or produce supporting material. Consequently the impugned proceeding was barred by limitation and the writ petition was allowed.
The HC held the revocation/penalty proceeding against the petitioner time-barred and quashed, directing that Regulation 17(1) CBLR, 2018 requires initiation within 90 days from receipt of an official offence report; the 2018 Regulations expressly define "offence report," which must emanate from an official source and need not follow any particular format. The respondent/licensing authority bore the burden to prove when its office received the offence report or prohibitory order but failed to do so and did not identify the triggering offence report or produce supporting material. Consequently the impugned proceeding was barred by limitation and the writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
