Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC dismissed all three appeals, holding that no proprietary right vested in the Purchaser in Liquidation under Section 54 because the Agreement to Sell stipulated full payment within 12 months and conditional transfer rights; permission to take bookings did not amount to a transferable right. The vendor validly terminated the ATS pursuant to its terms and is entitled to forfeit 20% of the sale consideration. The vendor must be afforded an opportunity to prove actual damages, particularly arising from the Purchaser's default in payments to the Authority, aggregate dues exceeding Rs.25 crores. The Court declined to adjudicate disputed monetary claims absent evidence and noted the Purchaser had not instituted a suit triable under Section 446(2).
The HC dismissed all three appeals, holding that no proprietary right vested in the Purchaser in Liquidation under Section 54 because the Agreement to Sell stipulated full payment within 12 months and conditional transfer rights; permission to take bookings did not amount to a transferable right. The vendor validly terminated the ATS pursuant to its terms and is entitled to forfeit 20% of the sale consideration. The vendor must be afforded an opportunity to prove actual damages, particularly arising from the Purchaser's default in payments to the Authority, aggregate dues exceeding Rs.25 crores. The Court declined to adjudicate disputed monetary claims absent evidence and noted the Purchaser had not instituted a suit triable under Section 446(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
