Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9441 to 9460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT quashed the assessment framed by the AO under section 143(3) as being void ab initio because it was predicated on a notice issued under section 143(2) that did not conform to the CBDT-prescribed format. Relying on relevant precedents, the Tribunal held the defective 143(2) notice-specifying only "computer aided scrutiny selection" without indicating limited or complete scrutiny or mandatory manual review-vitiated the consequent assessment proceedings. The appellate order allows the assessee's additional ground, sets aside the assessment dated 30.12.2019, and directs that any future proceedings comply strictly with statutory and CBDT procedural requirements.
The ITAT quashed the assessment framed by the AO under section 143(3) as being void ab initio because it was predicated on a notice issued under section 143(2) that did not conform to the CBDT-prescribed format. Relying on relevant precedents, the Tribunal held the defective 143(2) notice-specifying only "computer aided scrutiny selection" without indicating limited or complete scrutiny or mandatory manual review-vitiated the consequent assessment proceedings. The appellate order allows the assessee's additional ground, sets aside the assessment dated 30.12.2019, and directs that any future proceedings comply strictly with statutory and CBDT procedural requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.