Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.