Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
