Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
NCLAT held that an IRP/RP, vested with management of the corporate debtor (CD), has statutory authority to admit claims and that such admission constitutes an acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby resetting the limitation period for instituting CIRP under the IBC. The Tribunal found the RP's admission of the respondent's claim on 22.05.2022 and its subsequent update on 21.02.2024 to be valid acknowledgements; consequently the respondent's petitions were not time-barred. Both appeals were dismissed and the orders of the Adjudicating Authority were affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.