All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
Central Government notifies 11.541-hectare Special Economic Zone for semiconductor manufacturing; Approval Committee constituted, ICD status effective...
Government appoints National Customs Targeting Centre-Passenger director as customs officer with powers under PNR Regulations, 2022 and Sections 30A, ...
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
