Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
