The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9701 to 9720 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid and dismissed Revenue's grounds. The AO had conducted a detailed original assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) after considering the Taxpayer's exhaustive documentary submissions, including a submission dated 05.03.2015, and had allowed exemptions under sections 10A and 10AA. The reasons to believe did not disclose any fresh tangible material arising post-assessment; reliance on records from a subsequent year or on material already available at the time of original assessment cannot sustain reassessment. Consequently, the reassessment was held to be a review in substance, jurisdictionally impermissible, and the Taxpayer's exemptions under 10A/10AA were upheld.
ITAT affirmed that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid and dismissed Revenue's grounds. The AO had conducted a detailed original assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) after considering the Taxpayer's exhaustive documentary submissions, including a submission dated 05.03.2015, and had allowed exemptions under sections 10A and 10AA. The reasons to believe did not disclose any fresh tangible material arising post-assessment; reliance on records from a subsequent year or on material already available at the time of original assessment cannot sustain reassessment. Consequently, the reassessment was held to be a review in substance, jurisdictionally impermissible, and the Taxpayer's exemptions under 10A/10AA were upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
