<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening assessment under section 147 held invalid; original sections 143(3) and 144C(3) assessment upheld with 10A/10AA exemptions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93429</link>
    <description>ITAT affirmed that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid and dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds. The AO had conducted a detailed original assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) after considering the Taxpayer&#039;s exhaustive documentary submissions, including a submission dated 05.03.2015, and had allowed exemptions under sections 10A and 10AA. The reasons to believe did not disclose any fresh tangible material arising post-assessment; reliance on records from a subsequent year or on material already available at the time of original assessment cannot sustain reassessment. Consequently, the reassessment was held to be a review in substance, jurisdictionally impermissible, and the Taxpayer&#039;s exemptions under 10A/10AA were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening assessment under section 147 held invalid; original sections 143(3) and 144C(3) assessment upheld with 10A/10AA exemptions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93429</link>
      <description>ITAT affirmed that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid and dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds. The AO had conducted a detailed original assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) after considering the Taxpayer&#039;s exhaustive documentary submissions, including a submission dated 05.03.2015, and had allowed exemptions under sections 10A and 10AA. The reasons to believe did not disclose any fresh tangible material arising post-assessment; reliance on records from a subsequent year or on material already available at the time of original assessment cannot sustain reassessment. Consequently, the reassessment was held to be a review in substance, jurisdictionally impermissible, and the Taxpayer&#039;s exemptions under 10A/10AA were upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>