Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9981 to 10000 of 96504 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the miscellaneous application and upheld the ITAT's remand to the AO/TPO/DRP, holding that whether the assessee qualifies as a trader other than a wholesale trader depends on factual satisfaction of the two cumulative conditions in the CBDT notification dated 29.10.2015. The court observed the assessee had adduced material showing non-compliance with one condition and the ITAT had already accepted non-classification as a wholesale trader for AY 2014-15; consequently the issue is fact-centric and does not raise any substantial question of law, precluding judicial interference with the remand or directing application of a 3% tolerance.
The HC dismissed the miscellaneous application and upheld the ITAT's remand to the AO/TPO/DRP, holding that whether the assessee qualifies as a trader other than a wholesale trader depends on factual satisfaction of the two cumulative conditions in the CBDT notification dated 29.10.2015. The court observed the assessee had adduced material showing non-compliance with one condition and the ITAT had already accepted non-classification as a wholesale trader for AY 2014-15; consequently the issue is fact-centric and does not raise any substantial question of law, precluding judicial interference with the remand or directing application of a 3% tolerance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
