<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misc application dismissed; ITAT remand to AO/TPO/DRP upheld as trader classification under CBDT notification (29.10.2015) is fact-based</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93387</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the miscellaneous application and upheld the ITAT&#039;s remand to the AO/TPO/DRP, holding that whether the assessee qualifies as a trader other than a wholesale trader depends on factual satisfaction of the two cumulative conditions in the CBDT notification dated 29.10.2015. The court observed the assessee had adduced material showing non-compliance with one condition and the ITAT had already accepted non-classification as a wholesale trader for AY 2014-15; consequently the issue is fact-centric and does not raise any substantial question of law, precluding judicial interference with the remand or directing application of a 3% tolerance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misc application dismissed; ITAT remand to AO/TPO/DRP upheld as trader classification under CBDT notification (29.10.2015) is fact-based</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93387</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the miscellaneous application and upheld the ITAT&#039;s remand to the AO/TPO/DRP, holding that whether the assessee qualifies as a trader other than a wholesale trader depends on factual satisfaction of the two cumulative conditions in the CBDT notification dated 29.10.2015. The court observed the assessee had adduced material showing non-compliance with one condition and the ITAT had already accepted non-classification as a wholesale trader for AY 2014-15; consequently the issue is fact-centric and does not raise any substantial question of law, precluding judicial interference with the remand or directing application of a 3% tolerance.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>