Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC held that the impugned adjudication orders passed under s.73 of the GST Act violated principles of natural justice by denying personal hearing; in light of the Division Bench's pronouncement that personal hearing must ordinarily be afforded before adverse adjudicatory orders, the Court quashed the orders dated 11.12.2023 and 09.09.2025 as unsustainable. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority for de novo adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing. The petition is allowed; any limitation-based objections to earlier dismissal were considered but the lack of hearing rendered the prior orders void, necessitating fresh proceedings.
The HC held that the impugned adjudication orders passed under s.73 of the GST Act violated principles of natural justice by denying personal hearing; in light of the Division Bench's pronouncement that personal hearing must ordinarily be afforded before adverse adjudicatory orders, the Court quashed the orders dated 11.12.2023 and 09.09.2025 as unsustainable. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority for de novo adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing. The petition is allowed; any limitation-based objections to earlier dismissal were considered but the lack of hearing rendered the prior orders void, necessitating fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
