Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an adjudication order passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained when no personal hearing was afforded before passing the adverse order.
Analysis: The proceedings disclosed that the noticee had submitted replies to the show-cause notice, but no further notice for oral hearing was issued and no opportunity of personal hearing was granted before the adverse order was passed. Section 75(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 mandates that an opportunity of hearing shall be granted where an adverse decision is contemplated. In tax adjudication, compliance with this procedural safeguard is essential, unless the assessee waives the right or fails to avail a hearing that has been granted. On the admitted facts, neither waiver nor failure to avail a granted hearing was shown.
Conclusion: The order passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was unsustainable for breach of the requirement of personal hearing and was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Before passing an adverse adjudication order under the GST law, a personal hearing must be afforded where required by statute, and denial of that opportunity vitiates the order unless the right was waived or not availed after being granted.