Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected.
The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
