https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93359 The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93359 The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected. Highlights GST Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93359