Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected.
The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance-ruling application filed on 11-02-2025, holding it non-maintainable under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts because identical questions were already the subject of departmental proceedings commenced earlier. The Authority found the dispute-taxability arising from mismatched turnover declarations in GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B and the applicability of an exemption notification for solid-waste-management services to a municipal contract-was substantively identical to the scrutiny and recovery proceedings initiated by the assessing officer (DRC-01A dated 22-03-2024). Consequently, admission was precluded and the application was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.