Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
The HC allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may file a fresh application for condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) of the Act; the respondent is directed to consider such application on its merits and in accordance with law. The court observed the statutory requirement that condonation grounds demonstrate "genuine hardship," noted prior opportunities given to the petitioner to furnish supporting documents, and recorded deficiencies in the petitioner's earlier submissions, but nevertheless permitted renewal of the statutory remedy rather than dismissing statutory relief outright. No procedural infirmity requiring quashing of the condonation process was found.
The HC allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may file a fresh application for condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) of the Act; the respondent is directed to consider such application on its merits and in accordance with law. The court observed the statutory requirement that condonation grounds demonstrate "genuine hardship," noted prior opportunities given to the petitioner to furnish supporting documents, and recorded deficiencies in the petitioner's earlier submissions, but nevertheless permitted renewal of the statutory remedy rather than dismissing statutory relief outright. No procedural infirmity requiring quashing of the condonation process was found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.