<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ allowed; petitioner permitted to refile condonation application under s.119(2)(b), respondent must consider it on merits</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93354</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may file a fresh application for condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) of the Act; the respondent is directed to consider such application on its merits and in accordance with law. The court observed the statutory requirement that condonation grounds demonstrate &quot;genuine hardship,&quot; noted prior opportunities given to the petitioner to furnish supporting documents, and recorded deficiencies in the petitioner&#039;s earlier submissions, but nevertheless permitted renewal of the statutory remedy rather than dismissing statutory relief outright. No procedural infirmity requiring quashing of the condonation process was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ allowed; petitioner permitted to refile condonation application under s.119(2)(b), respondent must consider it on merits</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93354</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may file a fresh application for condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) of the Act; the respondent is directed to consider such application on its merits and in accordance with law. The court observed the statutory requirement that condonation grounds demonstrate &quot;genuine hardship,&quot; noted prior opportunities given to the petitioner to furnish supporting documents, and recorded deficiencies in the petitioner&#039;s earlier submissions, but nevertheless permitted renewal of the statutory remedy rather than dismissing statutory relief outright. No procedural infirmity requiring quashing of the condonation process was found.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>