Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The HC granted relief to the Petitioner, directing the tax authority to comply with statutory obligations under the CGST Act regarding seizure, copying and return of electronic devices and documents. The court held that inspection, search and seizure powers rest with the revenue, but materials not relied upon must be returned within 30 days and copies of seized data must be furnished to the Petitioner unless a written record shows prejudice to investigation. Finding that data extraction and cloning had largely been completed, the HC ordered the proprietor of the Petitioner to appear in person before an Authorised Officer to receive copies of the entire dataset and documents. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC granted relief to the Petitioner, directing the tax authority to comply with statutory obligations under the CGST Act regarding seizure, copying and return of electronic devices and documents. The court held that inspection, search and seizure powers rest with the revenue, but materials not relied upon must be returned within 30 days and copies of seized data must be furnished to the Petitioner unless a written record shows prejudice to investigation. Finding that data extraction and cloning had largely been completed, the HC ordered the proprietor of the Petitioner to appear in person before an Authorised Officer to receive copies of the entire dataset and documents. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
