<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax authority must return seized devices and provide data copies under CGST Act within 30 days</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93292</link>
    <description>The HC granted relief to the Petitioner, directing the tax authority to comply with statutory obligations under the CGST Act regarding seizure, copying and return of electronic devices and documents. The court held that inspection, search and seizure powers rest with the revenue, but materials not relied upon must be returned within 30 days and copies of seized data must be furnished to the Petitioner unless a written record shows prejudice to investigation. Finding that data extraction and cloning had largely been completed, the HC ordered the proprietor of the Petitioner to appear in person before an Authorised Officer to receive copies of the entire dataset and documents. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax authority must return seized devices and provide data copies under CGST Act within 30 days</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93292</link>
      <description>The HC granted relief to the Petitioner, directing the tax authority to comply with statutory obligations under the CGST Act regarding seizure, copying and return of electronic devices and documents. The court held that inspection, search and seizure powers rest with the revenue, but materials not relied upon must be returned within 30 days and copies of seized data must be furnished to the Petitioner unless a written record shows prejudice to investigation. Finding that data extraction and cloning had largely been completed, the HC ordered the proprietor of the Petitioner to appear in person before an Authorised Officer to receive copies of the entire dataset and documents. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>