Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC quashed the impugned Assessment Order dated 27.08.2024 for breach of natural justice, subject to the petitioner making a pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax in cash from its Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order; this pre-deposit remains liable to final adjustment or further demand. The petitioner must file a reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 31.05.2024, treating the quashed Assessment Order as an addendum, within 30 days. Upon compliance, the respondent shall pass fresh adjudicatory orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, preferably within three months. Petition disposed.
The HC quashed the impugned Assessment Order dated 27.08.2024 for breach of natural justice, subject to the petitioner making a pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax in cash from its Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order; this pre-deposit remains liable to final adjustment or further demand. The petitioner must file a reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 31.05.2024, treating the quashed Assessment Order as an addendum, within 30 days. Upon compliance, the respondent shall pass fresh adjudicatory orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, preferably within three months. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.