Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be quashed for want of personal hearing despite a specific request, and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration on conditions.
Analysis: The order was passed after a show cause notice, reminders, and a reply, but without affording the requested personal hearing. The dispute concerned the mismatch between input tax credit availed in Form GSTR-3B and the amount reflected in Form GSTR-2A, and the petitioner also disputed levy of interest under Section 50(3). In view of the denial of hearing and the court's approach in similar cases, the assessment order was set aside with a direction to deposit 25% of the disputed tax as pre-deposit, file a reply treating the impugned order as an addendum to the notice, and undergo fresh adjudication after hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh orders on merits, subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions.