Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Appellant's appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.
Appellant's appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
