<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal partly dismissed; Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117 Customs Act 1962 upheld for mis-declaration; remand for s.114 and Reg.13 reconsideration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93216</link>
    <description>Appellant&#039;s appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal partly dismissed; Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117 Customs Act 1962 upheld for mis-declaration; remand for s.114 and Reg.13 reconsideration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93216</link>
      <description>Appellant&#039;s appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>