Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
Appellant's appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.
Appellant's appeal dismissed in part: CESTAT upholds imposition of Rs.1,00,000 penalty under s.117, Customs Act 1962 for mis-declaration by a courier operator (consignment declared as copper wire contained prohibited red sandalwood) and for breach of Reg.12(1)(iii), CIER 2010. Tribunal finds original authority erred in refraining from imposing penalty under s.114; the s.114 and proposed action under Reg.13, CIER 2010 are remitted for fresh adjudication. Commissioner (Appeals) must afford appellant an opportunity of hearing on those proposals; Revenue is permitted to advance all grounds afresh. Order confirmed qua s.117, remaining directions set aside and matter remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.