Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10021 to 10040 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the CIT(E) with directions to admit and consider the additional evidence after affording the appellant an opportunity of hearing and decide the question of registration under s.12AA and allegations under s.13(1)(c) in accordance with law. The Tribunal held that the trust's objects could constitute benefit to the public (a cross-section) rather than to only its members, rejected the characterisation of the activities as inherently commercial given minimal volume, no fees and use of institutional infrastructure, and found that conclusions of non-genuineness were not warranted on the record.
The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the CIT(E) with directions to admit and consider the additional evidence after affording the appellant an opportunity of hearing and decide the question of registration under s.12AA and allegations under s.13(1)(c) in accordance with law. The Tribunal held that the trust's objects could constitute benefit to the public (a cross-section) rather than to only its members, rejected the characterisation of the activities as inherently commercial given minimal volume, no fees and use of institutional infrastructure, and found that conclusions of non-genuineness were not warranted on the record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.