Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Appeal allowed for statistical purposes; matter remitted to CIT(E) to admit additional evidence and decide s.12AA and s.13(1)(c) (1)(c)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the CIT(E) with directions to admit and consider the additional evidence after affording the appellant an opportunity of hearing and decide the question of registration under s.12AA and allegations under s.13(1)(c) in accordance with law. The Tribunal held that the trust's objects could constitute benefit to the public (a cross-section) rather than to only its members, rejected the characterisation of the activities as inherently commercial given minimal volume, no fees and use of institutional infrastructure, and found that conclusions of non-genuineness were not warranted on the record.....