Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC upheld that the DGFT notification relied on powers under Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and on paragraphs 1.02 and 2.01 of the FTP, recognising the Central Government's competence to amend the FTP and to regulate imports by prohibition or restriction. Notwithstanding this statutory foundation, the court found that the Petitioner established a strong prima facie case and granted ad-interim relief pendente lite, listing the matter for consideration of interim reliefs on 13 Nov 2025. The classification change and import prohibition remain subject to final adjudication.
The HC upheld that the DGFT notification relied on powers under Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and on paragraphs 1.02 and 2.01 of the FTP, recognising the Central Government's competence to amend the FTP and to regulate imports by prohibition or restriction. Notwithstanding this statutory foundation, the court found that the Petitioner established a strong prima facie case and granted ad-interim relief pendente lite, listing the matter for consideration of interim reliefs on 13 Nov 2025. The classification change and import prohibition remain subject to final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
