Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC upheld that the DGFT notification relied on powers under Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and on paragraphs 1.02 and 2.01 of the FTP, recognising the Central Government's competence to amend the FTP and to regulate imports by prohibition or restriction. Notwithstanding this statutory foundation, the court found that the Petitioner established a strong prima facie case and granted ad-interim relief pendente lite, listing the matter for consideration of interim reliefs on 13 Nov 2025. The classification change and import prohibition remain subject to final adjudication.
The HC upheld that the DGFT notification relied on powers under Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and on paragraphs 1.02 and 2.01 of the FTP, recognising the Central Government's competence to amend the FTP and to regulate imports by prohibition or restriction. Notwithstanding this statutory foundation, the court found that the Petitioner established a strong prima facie case and granted ad-interim relief pendente lite, listing the matter for consideration of interim reliefs on 13 Nov 2025. The classification change and import prohibition remain subject to final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.