Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld levy of tax under s.3F(1)(b) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, holding that the appellant is liable to pay tax on ink and processing/packing materials used in printing. The Court applied the principle that transfer of property in goods occurs when goods are incorporated in the works, and rejected the "dominant intention" test for works contracts. Because the appellant failed to furnish an itemised breakdown, the Assessing Authority properly assessed value; chemically altered ink and constituent chemicals were held to be transferred as goods. All statutory conditions for levy under s.3F(1)(b) were found satisfied.
The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld levy of tax under s.3F(1)(b) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, holding that the appellant is liable to pay tax on ink and processing/packing materials used in printing. The Court applied the principle that transfer of property in goods occurs when goods are incorporated in the works, and rejected the "dominant intention" test for works contracts. Because the appellant failed to furnish an itemised breakdown, the Assessing Authority properly assessed value; chemically altered ink and constituent chemicals were held to be transferred as goods. All statutory conditions for levy under s.3F(1)(b) were found satisfied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
