Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld levy of tax under s.3F(1)(b) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, holding that the appellant is liable to pay tax on ink and processing/packing materials used in printing. The Court applied the principle that transfer of property in goods occurs when goods are incorporated in the works, and rejected the 'dominant intention' test for works contracts. Because the appellant failed to furnish an itemised breakdown, the Assessing Authority properly assessed value; chemically altered ink and constituent chemicals were held to be transferred as goods. All statutory conditions for levy under s.3F(1)(b) were found satisfied.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
