Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, upholding the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 where a specific statutory appellate remedy is available. The Court held that the High Court's exercise of discretion to decline writ relief was neither arbitrary nor perverse. Accordingly, the petitioner's challenge is dismissed, with the petitioner granted liberty to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy under the statute. The decision affirms that where a statutory remedy exists, extraordinary constitutional writ jurisdiction will generally be declined, and parties must resort to the designated appellate forum for adjudication of attachment and related relief.
SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, upholding the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 where a specific statutory appellate remedy is available. The Court held that the High Court's exercise of discretion to decline writ relief was neither arbitrary nor perverse. Accordingly, the petitioner's challenge is dismissed, with the petitioner granted liberty to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy under the statute. The decision affirms that where a statutory remedy exists, extraordinary constitutional writ jurisdiction will generally be declined, and parties must resort to the designated appellate forum for adjudication of attachment and related relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
