Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Special leave petition dismissed against refusal to hear Article 226 writ challenging PMLA provisional attachment; appellate remedy allowed</h1> <h3>Mohan Rao Versus Directorate of Enforcement & Ors.</h3> SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging the HC's refusal to entertain a writ under Article 226 seeking to set aside a provisional attachment ... Refusal to entertain the petitioner’s writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - challenge to a provisional attachment order in view of availability of a specific appellate remedy under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - HELD THAT:- There are no reason to hold that exercise of discretion by the High Court not to entertain the writ petition is either arbitrary or perverse. Hence, the special leave petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a provisional attachment order in view of the availability of a specific appellate remedy under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. On review, the Supreme Court found no reason to hold that the High Court's discretion 'not to entertain the writ petition is either arbitrary or perverse.' The Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.12599/2025 is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy under the PMLA; the period to approach the appropriate authority is extended, as a special case, by two weeks from date. Pending applications are disposed of. SLP (Crl) Nos.12784/2025 and 12806/2025 are likewise dismissed with liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy and pending applications disposed of.