Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, upholding the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 where a specific statutory appellate remedy is available. The Court held that the High Court's exercise of discretion to decline writ relief was neither arbitrary nor perverse. Accordingly, the petitioner's challenge is dismissed, with the petitioner granted liberty to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy under the statute. The decision affirms that where a statutory remedy exists, extraordinary constitutional writ jurisdiction will generally be declined, and parties must resort to the designated appellate forum for adjudication of attachment and related relief.
SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, upholding the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 where a specific statutory appellate remedy is available. The Court held that the High Court's exercise of discretion to decline writ relief was neither arbitrary nor perverse. Accordingly, the petitioner's challenge is dismissed, with the petitioner granted liberty to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy under the statute. The decision affirms that where a statutory remedy exists, extraordinary constitutional writ jurisdiction will generally be declined, and parties must resort to the designated appellate forum for adjudication of attachment and related relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
