Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC upheld the HC orders condoning delay in filing tax appeals by the Revenue but found the HC's reasoning deficient and insufficiently detailed; the SC held that the HC must examine the facts pleaded in applications for condonation of delay with particularity before final disposal. Although no serious procedural or substantive error warranted interference with the condonation orders, in the interest of justice the SC directed the Revenue to pay costs quantified at Rs.25,000 to the respondent/assessees in each tax appeal before the HC and admonished that future condonation applications be decided on a detailed, fact-sensitive rationale.
SC upheld the HC orders condoning delay in filing tax appeals by the Revenue but found the HC's reasoning deficient and insufficiently detailed; the SC held that the HC must examine the facts pleaded in applications for condonation of delay with particularity before final disposal. Although no serious procedural or substantive error warranted interference with the condonation orders, in the interest of justice the SC directed the Revenue to pay costs quantified at Rs.25,000 to the respondent/assessees in each tax appeal before the HC and admonished that future condonation applications be decided on a detailed, fact-sensitive rationale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
