Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of SC upheld the HC orders condoning delay in filing tax appeals by the Revenue but found the HC's reasoning deficient and insufficiently detailed; the SC held that the HC must examine the facts pleaded in applications for condonation of delay with particularity before final disposal. Although no serious procedural or substantive error warranted interference with the condonation orders, in the interest of justice the SC directed the Revenue to pay costs quantified at Rs.25,000 to the respondent/assessees in each tax appeal before the HC and admonished that future condonation applications be decided on a detailed, fact-sensitive rationale.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
