Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the respondent Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, finding the impugned show-cause notices constituted a mere fishing inquiry and were issued without material having a live nexus to the sale-deed. Information from the public domain and the DVO's valuation report were held insufficient to prima facie establish payment of on-money; the valuation report being only an opinion requiring corroborative evidence. Because the records showed the sale-deed predated the search and transactions relied upon, the notices were held to be without jurisdiction and were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief as appropriate to the petitioners.
The HC held that the respondent Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, finding the impugned show-cause notices constituted a mere fishing inquiry and were issued without material having a live nexus to the sale-deed. Information from the public domain and the DVO's valuation report were held insufficient to prima facie establish payment of on-money; the valuation report being only an opinion requiring corroborative evidence. Because the records showed the sale-deed predated the search and transactions relied upon, the notices were held to be without jurisdiction and were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief as appropriate to the petitioners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
