<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to reopen assessment when show-cause notices are mere fishing inquiries without live nexus to sale deed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93071</link>
    <description>The HC held that the respondent Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, finding the impugned show-cause notices constituted a mere fishing inquiry and were issued without material having a live nexus to the sale-deed. Information from the public domain and the DVO&#039;s valuation report were held insufficient to prima facie establish payment of on-money; the valuation report being only an opinion requiring corroborative evidence. Because the records showed the sale-deed predated the search and transactions relied upon, the notices were held to be without jurisdiction and were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief as appropriate to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to reopen assessment when show-cause notices are mere fishing inquiries without live nexus to sale deed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93071</link>
      <description>The HC held that the respondent Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, finding the impugned show-cause notices constituted a mere fishing inquiry and were issued without material having a live nexus to the sale-deed. Information from the public domain and the DVO&#039;s valuation report were held insufficient to prima facie establish payment of on-money; the valuation report being only an opinion requiring corroborative evidence. Because the records showed the sale-deed predated the search and transactions relied upon, the notices were held to be without jurisdiction and were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief as appropriate to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>