Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC admitted the criminal appeal in a dishonour-of-cheque matter but conditioned relief on pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act, finding no exceptional circumstances to dispense with that requirement. The court recorded that the petitioners were heard and a reasoned order was rendered; the cheques were dishonoured in 2009 and conviction followed in 2024. The petitioners' invocation of Section 91 CrPC was rejected. Although the court acknowledged precedential authority permitting discretion to waive pre-deposit where specific reasons are recorded, it found no cogent or special reasons advanced by the petitioners and consequently dismissed the application.
The HC admitted the criminal appeal in a dishonour-of-cheque matter but conditioned relief on pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act, finding no exceptional circumstances to dispense with that requirement. The court recorded that the petitioners were heard and a reasoned order was rendered; the cheques were dishonoured in 2009 and conviction followed in 2024. The petitioners' invocation of Section 91 CrPC was rejected. Although the court acknowledged precedential authority permitting discretion to waive pre-deposit where specific reasons are recorded, it found no cogent or special reasons advanced by the petitioners and consequently dismissed the application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.