<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Criminal appeal in dishonour-of-cheque case admitted but relief conditioned on pre-deposit under Section 148 NI Act; Section 91 denied</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93051</link>
    <description>The HC admitted the criminal appeal in a dishonour-of-cheque matter but conditioned relief on pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act, finding no exceptional circumstances to dispense with that requirement. The court recorded that the petitioners were heard and a reasoned order was rendered; the cheques were dishonoured in 2009 and conviction followed in 2024. The petitioners&#039; invocation of Section 91 CrPC was rejected. Although the court acknowledged precedential authority permitting discretion to waive pre-deposit where specific reasons are recorded, it found no cogent or special reasons advanced by the petitioners and consequently dismissed the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal appeal in dishonour-of-cheque case admitted but relief conditioned on pre-deposit under Section 148 NI Act; Section 91 denied</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93051</link>
      <description>The HC admitted the criminal appeal in a dishonour-of-cheque matter but conditioned relief on pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act, finding no exceptional circumstances to dispense with that requirement. The court recorded that the petitioners were heard and a reasoned order was rendered; the cheques were dishonoured in 2009 and conviction followed in 2024. The petitioners&#039; invocation of Section 91 CrPC was rejected. Although the court acknowledged precedential authority permitting discretion to waive pre-deposit where specific reasons are recorded, it found no cogent or special reasons advanced by the petitioners and consequently dismissed the application.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>