Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
The HC, in a writ petition challenging the petitioner's inability to make a pre-deposit due to an "inactive" GST portal, added the necessary party as an added respondent and directed activation of the petitioner's portal within four weeks from date. The court held that continuation of the petition served no useful purpose pending activation and therefore stayed the impugned order dated 17 January 2025 for six weeks, or for two weeks after portal activation, whichever is later, provided such injunction shall not extend beyond 30 November 2025. The writ petition is disposed of on these terms, with the petitioner's right to access the portal restored subject to the specified timelines.
The HC, in a writ petition challenging the petitioner's inability to make a pre-deposit due to an "inactive" GST portal, added the necessary party as an added respondent and directed activation of the petitioner's portal within four weeks from date. The court held that continuation of the petition served no useful purpose pending activation and therefore stayed the impugned order dated 17 January 2025 for six weeks, or for two weeks after portal activation, whichever is later, provided such injunction shall not extend beyond 30 November 2025. The writ petition is disposed of on these terms, with the petitioner's right to access the portal restored subject to the specified timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
