Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's GST portal should be activated to enable payment of pre-deposit for maintaining the statutory appeal, and whether interim protection should be granted against the order under section 74 pending activation of the portal.
Analysis: The portal status was shown as inactive, while the registration had not been cancelled. The petitioner was unable to make the pre-deposit required for validation of the appeal. In these circumstances, the Court found that keeping the writ petition pending would serve no fruitful purpose and directed activation of the portal within a fixed time. The Court also granted limited interim protection so that the appeal could be regularised after the pre-deposit was made.
Outcome: The portal was directed to be activated, the impugned order was kept in abeyance for a limited period, and the writ petition was disposed of.