Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment is prospective and does not apply to accumulations made prior to AY 2023-24. The Tribunal found that the sum of Rs.30,00,000 was accumulated in FY 2016-17 and utilised in FY 2022-23 within the extended timeline permitted by the pre-amendment section 11(3), therefore it could not be treated as deemed income. The adjustment by the CPC and confirmation by the CIT(A) treating the amount as income taxable under section 115BBI was unsustainable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs.30,00,000 under section 115BBI.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment is prospective and does not apply to accumulations made prior to AY 2023-24. The Tribunal found that the sum of Rs.30,00,000 was accumulated in FY 2016-17 and utilised in FY 2022-23 within the extended timeline permitted by the pre-amendment section 11(3), therefore it could not be treated as deemed income. The adjustment by the CPC and confirmation by the CIT(A) treating the amount as income taxable under section 115BBI was unsustainable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs.30,00,000 under section 115BBI.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.