Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment is prospective and does not apply to accumulations made prior to AY 2023-24. The Tribunal found that the sum of Rs.30,00,000 was accumulated in FY 2016-17 and utilised in FY 2022-23 within the extended timeline permitted by the pre-amendment section 11(3), therefore it could not be treated as deemed income. The adjustment by the CPC and confirmation by the CIT(A) treating the amount as income taxable under section 115BBI was unsustainable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs.30,00,000 under section 115BBI.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
