Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment is prospective and does not apply to accumulations made prior to AY 2023-24. The Tribunal found that the sum of Rs.30,00,000 was accumulated in FY 2016-17 and utilised in FY 2022-23 within the extended timeline permitted by the pre-amendment section 11(3), therefore it could not be treated as deemed income. The adjustment by the CPC and confirmation by the CIT(A) treating the amount as income taxable under section 115BBI was unsustainable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs.30,00,000 under section 115BBI.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment is prospective and does not apply to accumulations made prior to AY 2023-24. The Tribunal found that the sum of Rs.30,00,000 was accumulated in FY 2016-17 and utilised in FY 2022-23 within the extended timeline permitted by the pre-amendment section 11(3), therefore it could not be treated as deemed income. The adjustment by the CPC and confirmation by the CIT(A) treating the amount as income taxable under section 115BBI was unsustainable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs.30,00,000 under section 115BBI.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
